Built by a self-represented litigant, this educational AI system helps pro se litigants organize facts, connect evidence, preview procedural risks, and simulate the litigation workflow before they act.
Educational simulation only. Not legal advice, legal representation, or court-ready filings.
Many pro se litigants have facts and evidence.
The problem is the workflow behind the case.
You have facts, but they are hard to explain clearly.
You have evidence, but it is not connected to specific facts.
Your discovery requests may be attacked as vague, overbroad, or not proportional.
You worry that winning a judgment may not mean getting paid.
Before asking AI to draft, organize the workflow behind the case.
This system was built from real pro se litigation experience — not from theory.
My name is Ming Jin.I am not a lawyer. I am a self-represented litigant.Through real civil litigation, I learned that facts and evidence are not enough unless they are organized into a clear litigation workflow.I experienced discovery disputes, procedural objections, motion practice problems, hearing preparation, and court orders.That is why I built Pro Se Procedure AI.A normal AI chat can help write text.
But it cannot replace a structured case workflow.This is an educational AI litigation workflow simulator. It helps pro se litigants organize facts, connect evidence, preview procedural risks, and simulate the case path before they act.It does not provide legal advice, legal representation, or court-ready filings.